Dr. Taubenberger who has worked on recreating the 1918 Spanish Flu is saying found in lungs in Autopsies 12/08/09 11:45am

Dr. Taubenberger who has worked on recreating the 1918 Spanish Flu is saying found in lungs in Autopsies in New York

The above is linked to an Examiner article by Victoria Nicks
UPDATE 12/17/09 - THE LINK IS TO THE ARTICLE DIRECTLY FROM THE GOVT. NOT VICKY NICKS ARTICLE - the above link is from the govt.

I find the little circle going there is very interesting. Let me explain, I have been trying as much as possible to follow a trail, it seems to be coming in a circle.

UPDATE 12/17/09 - Link to Victoria Nicks article -http://ww.examiner.com/x-29228-LA-Health-Technology-Examiner~y2009m12d7-NIH-Bulletin-says-New-York-swine-flu-victim-autopsies-show-lung-damage-similar--to-1918-Spanish-flu

I encourage people to read hers - to she how she references Dr. Taubenberger and she then links to Niman's site as the source of information of the "mutation".
There was no questioning of why a 6 month delay, besides not bringing up Dr. Taubenberger is most likely the reason the Swine Flu is going around the world in the first place. (End of Update 12/17/09)

First, understand almost every Examiner Swine Flu piece is written by Victoria Nicks.

Who is Victoria Nicks? She is an Air Force Military Veteran.

She is a Freelance writer, who seems to have connections and LOVES to Promote ONE Site OVER ALL OTHERS - She Loves to Profile Henry Niman and Recombinomics. She loves to write all about mutations. Also she wrote a book about the Swine Flu Vaccine and what ingredients are in it. I have not read the book - but it seems to be for the vaccine, it seems to give info, so people won't be scared of it. When she has directly written about the vaccine, she says any side effects are mild.

Here she writes how pregnant women should get vaccinated.

Here she writes the very simple differences of the seasonal flu vaccine compared to the Swine flu vaccine and states what the CDC Recommends.

Here she writes about the ingredients in the Swine Flu vaccine - says hardly any mercury AND Says CDC is recommending pregnant women to get vaccinated.

Here she basically recommends the Vaccine for Babies!
from her above article:

The H1N1 vaccine for babies is manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur, Inc. The H1N1 (swine flu) vaccine side effects are expected to be minimal, despite some of the ingredients.

She seems to have an IN with the Dr. Taubenberger, who may be directly responsible for what is happening, by him recreating the Spanish Flu - but she has a Definite IN with Henry Niman.

I am going to say this, we are being filled with disinformation - as if the Bacterial Pneumonia has been there all along and the H1N1 is what is causing it. Can viral REALLY go into something Bacterial. OR is it a spin saying there has been Bacterial Pneumonia previously, so no one needs to get all excited about any reports of spraying and then Bacterial Pneumonia afterwards?

So, considering the sources are EX Military - The Doctor WHO most likely helped Create what is going around AND a man who has been well embedded with Institutes - Scripp Institute, Harvard University and those have worked WITH Rockefeller Institute - AND has the INSIDE of the Virus "mutations" from WHO. Henry Niman, Firmly believes in vaccines and he recombines things for vaccines to be made from them. Also MANY others have raised doubts as I have found about Mr. Niman previously, as I have been researching him.

I believe we are being led down a lane that certain Higher people want us to go down.

BUT I will LOOK AT EVERYTHING CRITICALLY - Because I am figuring out, how the Disinfo works - So, Do I Seriously believe the H1N1 mutates to Bacterial Pneumonia or is that part of a "move along, nothing to see here - there have been no sprayings and the plague afterwards?"

Read things Critically! Think about who is making the statements - THEN research their history.

Parts from Article linked in the headline:

The scientists reviewed autopsy reports, hospital records and other clinical data from 34 people who died of 2009 H1N1 influenza infection between May 15 and July 9, 2009. All but two of the deaths occurred in New York City.

The team was led by James R. Gill, M.D., of the New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner and New York University School of Medicine, and Jeffery K. Taubenberger, M.D., Ph.D., of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at NIH. The findings are reported in the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, now available online and scheduled to appear in the February 2010 print issue.

One other question - if these are from autopsies from May and July WHY is it taking 6 MONTHS for the information to all of a sudden come out? When there seems to be information about sprayings and then bacterial pneumonia. They are all of a sudden releasing this info that H1N1 Swine flu is causing it? ALSO considering Ukraine deaths did NOT Test Positive for H1N1 but had bacterial pneumonia!

Just a few things to think about, as you read these various articles.

Time Line on WHO Silence On Ukraine's Cause of Death Results 11/9/09 10:00 pm est

Time Line on WHO Silence On Ukraine's Cause of Death Results

Recombinomics, is staying on top of this situation also, their comments are wonderful and telling at the same time. When you read between the lines, you can see they are frustrated and basically implying something is being Hidden by the WHO and those responsible for getting out the information about what is killing people.

From Article:

Timeline on WHO Silence on Ukraine H1N1 Sequences
Recombinomics Commentary 23:21
November 9, 2009

"There are a lot of unknowns," he said. The crew of experts will collect samples from patients and send them to the WHO's influenza collaborating center in London for diagnosis. The WHO may have more information on Nov. 4, Hartl said.

The above comments were made on Oct 30. The WHO update of the next day indicated that H1N1 had already been confirmed in two labs in Kyviv and samples were being sent to a WHO collaborating center, Mill Hill. Since H1N1 had already been lab confirmed twice, and multiple reports of symptoms of fatal cases left little doubt that the patients had died from hemorrhagic pneumonia, the main unknown question was the sequence of the H1N1. Thus, it seemed likely that comments on sequences would be made on Nov 4.

In the Nov 3 update, WHO acknowledged that the samples had been received in Mill Hill and it seemed that data would soon be announced, baring sample degradation. When Mill Hill announce confirmation of H1N1 in 15 samples it seemed likely that sequence results would soon follow.

There was no announcement on Nov 4, but there was a press conference on Nov 5, indicating that analysis was still ongoing, but there were no "big mutations" and the virus was antiviral sensitive. Thus, at least the initial sequencing of all eight gene segments had been completed and an initial analysis had already been made.

If there were no obvious changes, it seems that an announcement would have been made last week. The number of cases was approaching 1 million (see map), and the number of fatalities had already exceeded 100, including six health care workers. The infections were spreading east toward Kyviv and neighboring countries had an excessive number of cases, and deaths were mounting in Belarus.

This morning a clinical description of 90 fatal cases again supported hemorrhagic pneumonia, which once again raised concern about genetic changes.

However, there has only been silence on the sequences and they have not been made public. These delays suggest significant changes have been found, and these changes are undergoing further analysis, such as receptor binding testing.

An update on the sequences is long overdue.